martes, 23 de octubre de 2012

The third and last Presidential debate


In the past four weeks we’ve witnessed 4 debates, 3 of them presidential and one VP. With 2 clear wins for Obama, one for Gov. Romney and a too close to call finish between Biden & Ryan, we’re back where we started. With the President smooth sailing towards reelection. That’s not to say there haven’t been interesting moments, it’s actually been a very busy month for analysts all over the world. Here’s my take on the whole story:

Since most people are likely to have made up their minds by the time the debates are held and aren’t looking to be persuaded otherwise, there is a general consensus among experts that debates don’t really matter. There have been however, some exceptions to this rule. Like the Kennedy/Nixon debate of 1960 which according to many swung the election in favor of a more attractive and presidential JFK. Well, after the first debate in Denver in which Mitt Romney (then trailing by 4 points) clearly outwitted the President and won by a considerable margin, even I thought the election could go down the same path if Obama didn’t up his game. All that Romney needed was to take advantage of the momentum his first performance generated and deliver some more blows in New York and Florida. That didn’t happen.

The President comfortably took the second one home 46% to 39% leaving the score tied 1 to 1. Monday night was Romney’s last chance to prove his worth just days away from the election. The last clash was held at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Fla. It was a round table, a format similar to that of the Vice Presidential debate between Joe Biden and Paul Ryan. It was divided into segments, all regarding foreign policy. The moderator was the very experienced Bob Schieffer of CBS News, a household name when it comes to third debates; he moderated the Bush/Kerry debate of ’04 & the McCain/Obama of ’08.

Throughout his administration, the President has had many triumphs in foreign policy. He ended the war in Iraq, killed Osama Bin Laden and took part, along with other members of NATO, in the removal of Muammar Gaddafi from power in Libya, so there wasn’t much room for Romney to attack on this front, the only major setback in Obama’s policy was the government’s inability to protect the staff at the American Consulate in Benghazi from an attack that cost the lives of four men including ambassador Christopher Stevens. We were all expecting Romney to focus on this; it’d be his only real opportunity to question the President’s resolve when facing direct threats to the American people. Schieffer asked:

The first question and it concerns Libya. The controversy over what happened there continues...What happened? What caused it? Was it spontaneous? Was it an intelligence failure? Was it a policy failure? Was there an attempt to mislead people about what really happened?

 Obama knew this was the only place Romney could hit him and just when we were all expecting Romney’s usual bully self, he avoided it completely and just gave a general diagnosis of the Middle East situation. From Syria to Egypt, he even mentioned Mali. It was his only chance and he blew it.

Both of them focused on Israel which turned out to be the big winner of this debate. Would either of you be willing to declare that an attack on Israel is an attack on the United States? Asked Schieffer. The president was the first to answer:

 Israel is a true friend. It is our greatest ally in the region. And if Israel is attacked, America will stand with Israel” then came Mitt: “If Israel is attacked, we have their back, not just diplomatically, not just culturally, but militarily.”

It’s a very important point. They both support Israel, the difference is: would they be willing to allow or help Israel bomb Iran? We know Gov. Romney is a close friend of Prime Minister Netanyahu who’s adamant on bombing Iran before they get a nuclear bomb. This could potentially be a recipe for yet another conflict in the Middle East. President Obama has guaranteed that as long as he remains commander in chief, Iran won´t get a nuclear bomb but has never spoken of an attack, just sanctions to Iran if it continues to enrich uranium.

Obama’s greatest moment came when the Gov. questioned the downsizing of the military:

“Excuse me; our Navy is smaller now than at any time since 1917 (…) I want to make sure that we have the ships that are required by our Navy. Our Air Force is older and smaller than at any time since it was founded in 1947.”

To which Obama brilliantly responded:

“Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military's changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers, where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.”

The “horses and bayonets” line immediately became a worldwide trending topic on Twitter, it was the cherry on top of the President’s performance. Important omissions were the financial crisis in Europe and the war on drugs in Mexico, a country that shares a 2000 mile border with the U.S. and is immersed in a conflict much bloodier than Syria’s. Deaths in Mexico more than double Syria’s 30,000 in the last 6 years but somehow didn’t even deserve a mention.

Obama took this one too, without breaking a sweat. According to a CBS instant poll of uncommitted voters, he won the last debate 53% to 23%. So, after 3 debates Romney’s chances are pretty slim. The Huffington Post has the electoral vote count at 253 for Obama and 191 for Romney with just 14 days left in the campaign.  Intrade.com, a website in which there is actual money running on who will win the race has Obama at 57.1%, way ahead of Romney’s 43.0%.

The former governor of Massachusetts needs a miracle to turn this one around, between his “47%” comments and his lack of initiative in the last debate, he dug his own grave. Looks like the Obama’s will call1600 Pennsylvania Avenue home until 2016.






 


No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario